Wikipedia reliable source

This page in a nutshell: Cite reliable sources.You can add a citation by selecting from the drop-down menu at the top of the editing box.In markup, you can add a citation manually using ref tags. .

Per Wikipedia:Reliable source examples#Religious sources, religious sources may be accepted as a source for their own views, and such personal views should be presented in accordance with WP:RSOPINION. Religious scripture is a primary source and should be avoided per WP:PRIMARY, except for direct quotations. For everything else (history, …In today’s fast-paced digital world, it can be challenging to find reliable sources of news and information. With the rise of fake news and biased reporting, it is crucial to turn to trusted outlets for accurate and unbiased reporting.

Did you know?

ME: Not only Facebook can be a primary and reliable source, it's also the virtual place where the fact I want to add on wikipedia page happened. WM2: You're dumb, WM1 just told you Facebook can't be a primary source. Go away. ME: I can be dumb but I still think Facebook may be a primary and reliable source.A More Reliable Wikipedia Could Come from AI Research Assistants A neural network can identify Wikipedia references that are unlikely to support an article’s …If you have never written a Wikipedia article, see Wikipedia:Your first article.The following criteria are used to determine whether a nominated article is eligible for Did You Know: . New – The first priority is to understand that the article must be new, because newness can't be fixed later. To make a long story short: At least 80% of the article must be new (seven …

Jun 10, 2022 · How to cite Wikipedia in APA Style. In APA Style ( 7th edition ), only the first word of the title is capitalized, and there is no period after the URL. The in-text citation includes the title of the article (with title-case capitalization, and shortened if necessary) and the year. Example: APA Wikipedia citation. APA format. In fact, Wikipedia systematically compensates for the lack of credentials by heavy emphasis on reliable sources. It is a paradox: Wikipedia is one of the 10 most popular websites in the world according to TopSites, and by most measures it is the most widely read knowledge repository on Earth, but still it is often treated as not worth academic ...Wikipedia makes no guarantee or claim to be a reliable source of information. It has no formal peer review and anyone with a phone/computer and internet access can edit its content. That said, if ...View _711548.docx from COMMUNICAT UCU 100 at Kenyatta University. Surname 1 Student's Name Professor's Name Course Date Digital Media Wikipedia d.About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Contribute Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file; Search. Create account; Log in; Personal tools. Create account; Log in; Pages for logged out editors learn more. Contributions; Talk; Contents move to sidebar hide (Top) 1 A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for …

Oct 17, 2023 · Wikipedia doesn’t require any credentials or experience to edit. This means anyone with an internet connection can edit and add content. Many Wikipedia editors are fueled by passion and hidden agendas, not a desire to create unbiased coverage. 3 Reasons why Wikipedia is not a reliable source: Wikipedia’s editing structure; Lack of fact-checking The Free Dictionary is an American online dictionary and encyclopedia that aggregates information from various sources. It is accessible in fourteen languages. History. The Free Dictionary was launched in 2005 by Farlex. In the ... is done to avoid duplicate content in the search-engine results and prevent user traffic that would otherwise go to Wikipedia. …This article is a list of the tallest pyramids in the world, both ancient and modern. In order to qualify for inclusion, each entry must be referred to as a "pyramid" (not just "pyramidal", "pyramid-shaped", or "in the shape of a pyramid") by reliable sources and be at least 50 meters (160 ft) tall. ….

Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. Wikipedia reliable source. Possible cause: Not clear wikipedia reliable source.

Jul 9, 2021 · Even with dedicated and talented contributors, the nature of Wikipedia allows anyone to make content. Wikipedia offers a wealth of information, but consider double-checking content with another credible source before including it in your thesis or essay. Wikipedia is a widely used internet tool, but err on the side of caution as we look at why ... In the era of “fake news” and mass misinformation, finding a reliable news source can prove tricky at times. In fact, new sources like Politico, a political journalism company, have created entire sub-categories dedicated to analyzing and w...

In Wikipedia, verifiability means that people reading and editing the encyclopedia can check that information comes from a reliable source. No original research – Wikipedia does not publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis ...There are three citations from reliable sources, including two from Disney, that state it will be aired on October 18, 2009. TV Guide, another reliable source, supports this. That is why October 18 is used in the article. YouTube is not a reliable source so it can't be used to support an earlier airdate, especially since the airdate isn't ...The difficulty, of course, lies in that word “reliable.” Generative AI has an unfortunate tendency to hallucinate , at times making up both information and seemingly …

dipmeter Health information services. Employees. 279 (2018) URL. www .healthline .com. Healthline Media, Inc. is an American website and provider of health information headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was founded in 1999, relaunched in 2006, and established as a standalone entity in January 2016.Wikipedia's guideline on Reliable sources states that "Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." Wikipedia's guideline on Notability states that "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to ... lansas footballo'reilly's port orange 5) This person is no an historian and there are so many factual errors in his article that it is not a Wikipedia Wikipedia reliable source--Philip Baird Shearer 20:27, 15 October 2006 (UTC) Reply . point 5) Yes, he is a historian, and his point of view is just as valid as your Gomez shining knight figure (and I would argue certainly more). abai program The way wikipedia judges sources and users editing it is that a hundred people gradually calcifying an article over a decade is somehow more reliable than someone like me, knowing what I know, going in and trying to redo it all to modern factual standards, and if you try to be revolutionary, you will not win the arbitration process. ku homecoming football gamehow to add another artboard in illustratorhouston mbb Coal is important because it is a reliable and an affordable source of energy in many countries. It is responsible for about 40 percent of the electricity generated in the world. Coal is a crucial ingredient in manufacturing industries. o'reilly auto parts barbourville kentucky This list summarizes prior consensus and consolidates links to the most in-depth and recent discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere on Wikipedia. Context matters tremendously, and some sources may or may not be suitable for certain uses depending on the situation.The Ancient History Encyclopedia was founded in 2009 by van der Crabben with the stated goal of improving history education worldwide by creating a freely accessible and reliable history source. The nonprofit organization is based in Godalming , United Kingdom and Montreal , Canada , although it has no office and its team is globally distributed. when do the kansas jayhawks playwho leads the league in strikeoutsaccuweather brentwood tn What we do is find neutral ways of presenting them." That issue holds no value because many reliable sources state this event as a Genocide such as 'Genocide in Libya Shar, a Hidden Colonial History By Ali Abdullatif Ahmida'. That book follows all the requirements to be a reputable source according to Wikipedias rule about reliable sources. The ...The reliability of a source can help you judge the weight to give the opinions of that source. The more reliable the source, the more weight you should give its opinion. For sources of very low reliability, due weight may be no mention at all. Sources may still have systemic bias problems.